Category: Movies

  • Anomie

    Dhanya and I watched Anomie after Mohiniattam. I wanted to watch the movie but Dhanya did not initially. The only reason we went ahead was because there was a Pirate Explains video of the film that we could fall back on in case we did not understand the movie.

    We did not watch it continuously. But, over a few days.

    At the heart of the film is Zara (Bhavana), whose brother’s disappearance — and the string of murders that follows people with a similar condition — and her reveal that they all died under similar conditions sets the plot in motion. Running parallel to the official police inquiry, her own search for answers plays out almost passively for most of the runtime. She asks around, follows leads that go nowhere, and seems, frankly, to be going through the motions rather than driving the case forward.

    That’s exactly what makes the third-act reveal land so well. What reads as a half-hearted, meandering investigation turns out to be deliberately constructed that way. Once the reveal hits, you find yourself mentally rewinding through her scenes and realizing the film was quietly building toward this the whole time.

    The bigger swing, though, is the film’s central sci-fi conceit. It is a sub-title, The Equation of Death. Rather than treating the afterlife as an abstraction or a metaphor, Anomie visualizes it. The production design and Sujith Sarang’s cinematography lean into color grading and imagery that make the afterlife sequences feel genuinely otherworldly. It almost feels like a space movie.

    The Pirate Explains video tells a lot about where the science in Zara’s investigation gets wrong. He also puts in better words the sci-fi visualization in the movie. But, only watch it after you watch the movie.

  • Bharatnatyam and Mohiniattam

    The Malayalam movie, not the dance form. Spoilers ahead!

    Instagram and YouTube shorts manipulated me into wanting to watch this movie. It came frequently enough and I was interested enough to watch it.

    I watched it with my wife who was watching it for the second time. The first time she watched both the movies was after a fight we had.

    Bharatnatyam is part one of this duology. It didn’t do well in the theaters and did wonderfully well on OTT. S R Praveen had written about this phenomenon (paywalled) for The Hindu. That encouraged the film makers to make a part two.

    Both the movies have a lot of inside jokes and nods to other Malaylam movies.

    The first film centers on Bharathan Nair, a strict patriarch played by Sai Kumar, and his son Sashi (Saiju Kurup), who discovers — after his father’s paralytic stroke — that Bharathan has been secretly running a second family in northern Kerala for years. What could have been a heavy melodrama is instead handled with a light, situational comic touch, and that’s exactly what worked for me.

    The sequel picks up after Bharathan Nair’s death, as Sashi and his family travel to meet Rukmini and Ajay at their new home. What starts as a family reunion spirals into something far more unsettling: the revelation that a local temple — and the deity people have been devoutly worshipping — was fabricated by Bharathan Nair himself, seemingly as a means of siphoning public donations.

    After watching these two movies, I would suggest that you watch The Pirate Explains video that help you catch things you may not have caught in the first viewing and also the various Malayalam movies that these movies has references to.

    What makes watching these two films together so rewarding is the contrast. The first is about a private family secret and asks what you owe the people closest to you when the truth comes out. The second scales that same premise up to a public, communal level — asking what a lie can do when it’s not just kept inside a family, but sold to an entire town as sacred truth. One is about protecting people you love from an uncomfortable truth; the other is about what happens when that same instinct curdles into exploiting people’s faith for money, and then killing to keep it buried.

  • Political Propoganda

    This is an Instagram post on the Malayalam movie, Guru. It asks a political question for all ages.

  • Sarvam Maya

    My wife and I watched Sarvam Maya on JioHotstar, together on a day when the kids were away at school. They joined us during the second sitting of the movie.

    It has been a long time since we saw something this light hearted and comic while addressing many things we see in our society around us. It covers how we think about ghosts, how we think about Gen Z (and their ghostly behaviour), atheism, shades of the drug issue in Kerala, and our shallow beliefs in our religious practice.

    The ending flummoxed me. Even such a light hearted movie required so much work as a viewer. There are deleted scenes on the Director’s and Producer’s YouTube channels. There is a podcast by the Director and actors from the movie, again on their YouTube channel. I finally had to also watch a Pirate Explains video on YouTube.

    The deleted scenes and the podcast are in the playlist below.

    There is a lot of content online from the actors of the movie. I finally stopped watching content from them.

  • eko

    I spent the hours leading up to the New Year’s watching eko which dropped on Netflix. We watched together as a family. I really enjoyed watching this finale of the Animal trilogy.

    The story telling with a twist in the tale reminiscent of Jeffrey Archer who wrote a book of short stories with that name. Doing that with three stories on television/theatre is difficult.

    As the Wikipedia page for eko says:

    Eko serves as the third and final instalment of Bahul Ramesh’s Animal Trilogy, following Kishkindha Kaandam (2024) and Kerala Crime Files 2 (2025).

    I recently needed to read about movies to understand the story better after just one viewing. I didn’t have the energy to watch them again to discover these hidden layers. I even overlooked some details when reading about them. That’s when I found the explanations on The Pirate Explains YouTube channel helpful.

    The first video from the channel is about the questions you may have had you watched the movie only once. I would warn you against watching this video unless you have watched the movie at least once.

    The same channel had another video that fixes the timeline in the movie for you, but I didn’t think that was that much of a value add.

    Sometimes protection and restriction, both look the same. This is the thought with which Bahul Ramesh wrote eko. I enjoyed learning about his intuitive writing of the first draft in this interview with Baradwaj Rangan.

    He has a really unique storywriting process. Dialogue, Screenplay, and Story.

    But, eventually, this means that I can’t post a review immediately after watching it.

  • Atrangi Re (2021)

    We watched this movie in the morning of the first day of the new year. We were looking for something light-hearted. I had not read any of the reviews and things got pretty serious very fast.

  • Bheemante Vazhi (2021)

    We watched Bheemante Vazhi on New Year’s eve on December 31, 2021. The film portrays the efforts of a people in a poor neighborhood on the side of the railway tracks trying to get an accessible road to their houses.

    Theatrical Release Poster of Bheemante Vazhi

    The movie highlights the plight of any person who undertakes public tasks in a community in Kerala. The film highlights these in a light hearted way.

    Kunchako Boban’s character Sanju aka Bheeman’s love stories in the movie seem interesting choices. Be it the one-way or the love-to-get-your-work-done with the Railway Engineer or the girl who seemed to be waiting for him to make a proposal. Does the presence of martial arts in this movie and in Minnal Murali point to something?

    I enjoyed the climax fight scene involving not your usual suspects. I did not understand the animation for the intro scene of the movie. I guess like other Malayalam movies of the day, I would need to read reviews to understand these nuances.

  • Solo (2017)

    The music from this movie introduced me to Agam, Thaikkudam Bridge and Masala Coffee. It was this music that made me curious about the movie. I had seen bits of it before but when I saw the movie was on Netflix, I thought that it was good use if any of my month long subscription.

    I saw the Tamil version of Solo. It stars Dulquer Salman. It constitutes four parts – the elements of Earth, Air, Fire and Water. It looks at the four forms of Shiva. I loved the art and the filming style.

    There are many gaps in the story that I was curious about. I like open ended stories. I like non-reveals. I loved this movie.

  • The Minimalists: Less is Now (2021, Netflix)

    The Minimalists are a duo who blogged about minimalism alongside others in the late noughties (2000’s). In 2015, they made a move called Minimalism, about the movement. The movie was a conversation that the Minimalists had with many prominent participants and bloggers of the movement.

    Many of the bloggers who participated in that movement have now changed their focus away from Minimalism and moved on to other things. I, myself feel drawn more to the idea that Greg McKeown presented in Essentialism. Minimalism is a movement that forms an ideal foundation for many more pragmatic movements and ideas.

    The Minimalists are back in 2021 with a follow-up documentary called Less is Now. In this documentary, they talk about their own story. It features a few experts who talk about the financial, economic and environmental burden cost by “stuff”. The story is interlaced with stories of many ordinary individuals who followed the principles laid down by the movement.

    The film is directed by Matt D’Avella, whose YouTube channel I follow. I love to watch the videos that Matt directs and that’s possibly the only reason I wanted to watch this documentary.

    I subscribed to a month of Netflix again just to watch this 50 minute documentary. I think just watching Matt’s film making was worth watching this.

  • Cargo (2019)

    A spacey afterlife, I had tweeted after I first saw the trailer of Cargo on YouTube.

    Netflix trailer for Cargo

    I have had a love affair with space since I was a teenager. But, I wasn’t the brave type of fellow who would enjoy being strapped to a rocket. So, I had settled for dreams of being an engineer on Earth who sent people out into space. If forced to leave Earth, I would definitely not be in the first few flights off Earth.

    The only way for me to access space in those teenage years through the pages of a science fiction book. I have recently started reading Indian science fiction again by reading Gautam Bhatia’s The Wall. I thought this was a movie I could watch as part of that project.

    Going to space after death! People seem to be going to and from the spacecraft without rockets. But, I wonder if the fear of sitting on a rocket will play a role after you die.

    Death is a great segue to spirituality, my other interest. Hinduism views death as the first step in the reincarnation process. One dies. Then, one is re-born. The idea is to break this cycle of life, death and re-birth. My personal reading in spirituality has been centered around the Upanishads. I see them as a mental model to answer some of the difficult questions I have till science gives us more concrete answers.

    Cargo combines space and death in a very innovative way.

    References

    As I watched the movie, I was looking up the movie on Wikipedia and Google to understand more of the space and spirituality references the movie uses. What follows are the ones that I found.

    The connection to bulls as the mount used by Yama, the Hindu god of death is the logo for the Post Death Transition Services. It is well branded on the coffee mug that the protagonist uses.

    The spaceship where they ‘transition’ human beings from one life to the next are called Pushpak. Pushpak is the first reference to a vimana in Hindu texts. This is a chariot built by Vishwakarma for Brahma, the Hindu god of creation. This is the vehicle that Ravana later stole from Kubera, the Hindu god of wealth who got it from Brahma. Vishwakarma is the divine architect and god of architects and engineers. Look at how technical and step-by-step the ‘transition’ is. Doff of the hat to Vishwakarma?

    The lead is named Prahasta. Prahasta is the General of the Lankan army and Ravana’s maternal uncle. In the war with Rama, Prahasta is the general of the army leading the first wave. So, Prahasta in the movie, is one of the first six rakshasa-astronauts who fly the first Pushpak?

    Prahasta’s science guy at Ground control is named Raman sir. Doff of the hat to C V Raman?

    My take

    Many of the Upanishads take the question-answer mode between two or multiple people to tackle deep philosophical questions. Many of them have a guru-disciple setting. I think the movie sets the spacecraft as a back drop to have a few question-answer mode between Yuvishka as the student and Prahasta as a guru.

    I would consider everything else being nothing more than setting up the scene for this conversation.

    I am not sure if the human-rakshasa agreement where humans agree to be led by rakshasas is a commentary on the present political climate?

    I think there are more references and hooks that are present in the film that I may not get as I am not a full time movie goer.